i3-12100 vs i9-13900K - Godfall RTX 4080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i9-13900K

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
34549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
4683 Pts

Godfall

i3-12100 vs i9-13900K in Godfall using RTX 4080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i9-13900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
179.8 FPS
1080p
205.1 FPS
1440p
120.1 FPS
1440p
130.8 FPS
2160p
57.1 FPS
2160p
62.2 FPS
w1440p
94.8 FPS
w1440p
103.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
256.9 FPS
1080p
286.3 FPS
1440p
183.7 FPS
1440p
197.3 FPS
2160p
98.0 FPS
2160p
105.4 FPS
w1440p
150.6 FPS
w1440p
161.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
334.1 FPS
1080p
367.6 FPS
1440p
247.4 FPS
1440p
263.8 FPS
2160p
138.8 FPS
2160p
148.6 FPS
w1440p
206.5 FPS
w1440p
220.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
488.3 FPS
1080p
530.0 FPS
1440p
374.6 FPS
1440p
396.9 FPS
2160p
220.6 FPS
2160p
235.0 FPS
w1440p
318.1 FPS
w1440p
337.6 FPS
i3-12100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i9-13900K
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.

Compare i3-12100 vs i9-13900K specifications

i3-12100 vs i9-13900K Architecture

i3-12100 i9-13900K
ChipsetsZ690, H670, B660, H610Z690, Z790
CodenameAlder Lake-SRaptor Lake-S
DDR4 Speed3200 MT/s3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed4800 MT/s5600 MT/s
ECC MemoryNoYes
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i9 (Raptor Lake)
Launch MSRP$122$589
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Part#SRL62SRMBH
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateJan 4th, 2022Sep 27th, 2022

i3-12100 vs i9-13900K Cache

i3-12100 i9-13900K
Cache L180K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)2MB (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)36MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i9-13900K Cores

i3-12100 i9-13900K
# of Cores424
# of Threads832
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i9-13900K Performance

i3-12100 i9-13900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier33.0x30.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
PL160W253 W
PL289W253 W
PL2 Tau Limit28 secondsUnlimited
TDP60 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 5.8 GHz

i3-12100 vs i9-13900K Physical

i3-12100 i9-13900K
Die Size163 mm²257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i3-12100 vs i9-13900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments