i5-10400 vs Athlon II X4 630 - Fallout 76 RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 Athlon II X4 630

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
3134 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
956 Pts

Fallout 76

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X4 630 in Fallout 76 using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 Athlon II X4 630

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
153.1 FPS
1080p
62.2 FPS
1440p
117.1 FPS
1440p
47.6 FPS
2160p
68.1 FPS
2160p
27.7 FPS
w1440p
99.1 FPS
w1440p
40.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
224.9 FPS
1080p
105.4 FPS
1440p
179.9 FPS
1440p
83.8 FPS
2160p
113.8 FPS
2160p
52.5 FPS
w1440p
156.4 FPS
w1440p
72.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
296.8 FPS
1080p
148.6 FPS
1440p
242.7 FPS
1440p
120.1 FPS
2160p
159.6 FPS
2160p
77.4 FPS
w1440p
213.6 FPS
w1440p
105.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
440.4 FPS
1080p
235.0 FPS
1440p
368.2 FPS
1440p
192.5 FPS
2160p
251.1 FPS
2160p
127.0 FPS
w1440p
328.2 FPS
w1440p
169.7 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-10400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X4 630
  • The Athlon II X4 630 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i5-10400 vs Athlon II X4 630 specifications

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X4 630 Architecture

i5-10400 Athlon II X4 630
CodenameComet LakePropus
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Athlon II X4 (Propus)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX630WFK42GIADX630WFGIBOXADX630WFK42GMADX630WFGMBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020Sep 2009

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X4 630 Cache

i5-10400 Athlon II X4 630
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X4 630 Cores

i5-10400 Athlon II X4 630
# of Cores64
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X4 630 Features

i5-10400 Athlon II X4 630
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X4 630 Notes

i5-10400 Athlon II X4 630

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X4 630 Performance

i5-10400 Athlon II X4 630
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplier29.0x14.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.425 V

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X4 630 Physical

i5-10400 Athlon II X4 630
Die Sizeunknown169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1200µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown300 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-10400 vs Athlon II X4 630 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments