i9-10900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 - Elden Ring RX 6450M - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K Core2 Duo E7400

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
1775 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1145 Pts

Elden Ring

i9-10900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 in Elden Ring using RX 6450M - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K Core2 Duo E7400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
40.1 FPS
1080p
16.9 FPS
1440p
31.7 FPS
1440p
13.3 FPS
2160p
18.0 FPS
2160p
7.6 FPS
w1440p
26.6 FPS
w1440p
11.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
72.3 FPS
1080p
34.1 FPS
1440p
59.1 FPS
1440p
27.7 FPS
2160p
36.1 FPS
2160p
16.9 FPS
w1440p
50.7 FPS
w1440p
23.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
104.6 FPS
1080p
51.4 FPS
1440p
86.4 FPS
1440p
42.0 FPS
2160p
54.2 FPS
2160p
26.1 FPS
w1440p
74.8 FPS
w1440p
36.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
169.1 FPS
1080p
85.9 FPS
1440p
141.1 FPS
1440p
70.8 FPS
2160p
90.3 FPS
2160p
44.7 FPS
w1440p
123.1 FPS
w1440p
61.5 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i9-10900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Core2 Duo E7400
  • The Core2 Duo E7400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-10900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 specifications

i9-10900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 Architecture

i9-10900K Core2 Duo E7400
CodenameComet LakeWolfdale
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core 2 Duo (Wolfdale)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Part#unknownSLGW3
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020Oct 2008

i9-10900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 Cache

i9-10900K Core2 Duo E7400
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)3MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 Cores

i9-10900K Core2 Duo E7400
# of Cores102
# of Threads202
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 Features

i9-10900K Core2 Duo E7400
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4 Intel 64 C1E C2E EIST VT

i9-10900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 Notes

i9-10900K Core2 Duo E7400

i9-10900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 Performance

i9-10900K Core2 Duo E7400
Base Clock100 MHz266 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplier37.0x10.5x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.11 V

i9-10900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 Physical

i9-10900K Core2 Duo E7400
Die Sizeunknown82 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA6
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 775
Transistorsunknown228 million
tCaseMax72°C74°C

Compare i9-10900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments