i9-12900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 - Doom Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-12900K Core2 Duo E7400

Multi-Thread Performance

28791 Pts
1775 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3903 Pts
1145 Pts

Doom

i9-12900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 in Doom using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-12900K Core2 Duo E7400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
135.4 FPS
1080p
54.7 FPS
1440p
95.9 FPS
1440p
39.7 FPS
2160p
49.6 FPS
2160p
20.5 FPS
w1440p
77.8 FPS
w1440p
32.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
203.1 FPS
1080p
94.4 FPS
1440p
152.1 FPS
1440p
71.7 FPS
2160p
86.8 FPS
2160p
40.4 FPS
w1440p
127.5 FPS
w1440p
59.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
270.8 FPS
1080p
134.2 FPS
1440p
208.3 FPS
1440p
103.7 FPS
2160p
124.1 FPS
2160p
60.3 FPS
w1440p
177.1 FPS
w1440p
87.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
406.1 FPS
1080p
213.7 FPS
1440p
320.7 FPS
1440p
167.8 FPS
2160p
198.6 FPS
2160p
100.2 FPS
w1440p
276.5 FPS
w1440p
142.8 FPS
i9-12900K
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-12900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-12900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-12900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Core2 Duo E7400
  • The Core2 Duo E7400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-12900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 specifications

i9-12900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 Architecture

i9-12900K Core2 Duo E7400
CodenameAlder LakeWolfdale
GenerationCore i9 (Alder Lake-S)Core 2 Duo (Wolfdale)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channelDDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Part#unknownSLGW3
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i9-12900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 Cache

i9-12900K Core2 Duo E7400
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L214MB (shared)3MB (shared)

i9-12900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 Cores

i9-12900K Core2 Duo E7400
# of Cores162
# of Threads242
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-12900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 Performance

i9-12900K Core2 Duo E7400
Base Clock100 MHz266 MHz
Frequency3.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplier32.0x10.5x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.2 GHzN/A

i9-12900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 Physical

i9-12900K Core2 Duo E7400
Die Sizeunknown82 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1700FC-LGA6
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 775
Transistorsunknown228 million
tCaseMax72°C74°C

Compare i9-12900K vs Core2 Duo E7400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments