i9-12900K vs Phenom II X6 1035T - Doom Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-12900K Phenom II X6 1035T

Multi-Thread Performance

28791 Pts
4665 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3903 Pts
1014 Pts

Doom

i9-12900K vs Phenom II X6 1035T in Doom using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-12900K Phenom II X6 1035T

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
104.6 FPS
1080p
43.7 FPS
1440p
75.2 FPS
1440p
32.2 FPS
2160p
39.0 FPS
2160p
16.7 FPS
w1440p
61.1 FPS
w1440p
26.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
163.6 FPS
1080p
77.9 FPS
1440p
123.8 FPS
1440p
59.9 FPS
2160p
70.6 FPS
2160p
33.8 FPS
w1440p
103.8 FPS
w1440p
49.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
222.7 FPS
1080p
112.1 FPS
1440p
172.5 FPS
1440p
87.5 FPS
2160p
102.3 FPS
2160p
50.9 FPS
w1440p
146.5 FPS
w1440p
73.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
340.7 FPS
1080p
180.5 FPS
1440p
269.8 FPS
1440p
142.8 FPS
2160p
165.5 FPS
2160p
85.0 FPS
w1440p
231.9 FPS
w1440p
121.3 FPS
i9-12900K
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-12900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-12900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-12900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X6 1035T
  • The Phenom II X6 1035T has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X6 1035T is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The Phenom II X6 1035T has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i9-12900K vs Phenom II X6 1035T specifications

i9-12900K vs Phenom II X6 1035T Architecture

i9-12900K Phenom II X6 1035T
CodenameAlder LakeThuban
GenerationCore i9 (Alder Lake-S)Phenom II X6 (Thuban)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channelDDR3
Part#unknownHDT35TWFK6DGRHDT35TWFGRBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i9-12900K vs Phenom II X6 1035T Cache

i9-12900K Phenom II X6 1035T
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L214MB (shared)512K (per core)
Cache L330MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i9-12900K vs Phenom II X6 1035T Cores

i9-12900K Phenom II X6 1035T
# of Cores166
# of Threads246
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-12900K vs Phenom II X6 1035T Performance

i9-12900K Phenom II X6 1035T
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Multiplier32.0x13.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.2 GHzup to 3.1 GHz

i9-12900K vs Phenom II X6 1035T Physical

i9-12900K Phenom II X6 1035T
Die Sizeunknown346 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1700µPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown904 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-12900K vs Phenom II X6 1035T in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments