i7-12700K vs Athlon II X2 265 - Doom GTX 1650 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i7-12700K Athlon II X2 265

Multi-Thread Performance

23836 Pts
1890 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3768 Pts
1117 Pts

Doom

i7-12700K vs Athlon II X2 265 in Doom using GTX 1650 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i7-12700K Athlon II X2 265

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
77.9 FPS
1080p
32.8 FPS
1440p
50.9 FPS
1440p
22.4 FPS
2160p
25.5 FPS
2160p
11.2 FPS
w1440p
40.8 FPS
w1440p
17.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
127.6 FPS
1080p
60.8 FPS
1440p
88.8 FPS
1440p
43.7 FPS
2160p
48.9 FPS
2160p
23.8 FPS
w1440p
73.4 FPS
w1440p
35.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
177.3 FPS
1080p
88.8 FPS
1440p
126.7 FPS
1440p
64.9 FPS
2160p
72.3 FPS
2160p
36.4 FPS
w1440p
106.1 FPS
w1440p
53.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
276.7 FPS
1080p
144.9 FPS
1440p
202.5 FPS
1440p
107.5 FPS
2160p
119.1 FPS
2160p
61.5 FPS
w1440p
171.3 FPS
w1440p
89.9 FPS
i7-12700K
  • The i7-12700K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i7-12700K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i7-12700K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i7-12700K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 265
  • The Athlon II X2 265 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i7-12700K vs Athlon II X2 265 specifications

i7-12700K vs Athlon II X2 265 Architecture

i7-12700K Athlon II X2 265
CodenameAlder LakeRegor
GenerationCore i7 (Alder Lake-S)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channelDDR2, DDR3
Part#unknownADX265OCK23GM
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i7-12700K vs Athlon II X2 265 Cache

i7-12700K Athlon II X2 265
Cache L164K (per core)128K
Cache L212MB (shared)1MB

i7-12700K vs Athlon II X2 265 Cores

i7-12700K Athlon II X2 265
# of Cores122
# of Threads202
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i7-12700K vs Athlon II X2 265 Performance

i7-12700K Athlon II X2 265
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier36.0x16.5x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5 GHzN/A

i7-12700K vs Athlon II X2 265 Physical

i7-12700K Athlon II X2 265
Die Sizeunknown117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1700µPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown410 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i7-12700K vs Athlon II X2 265 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments