i5-11600K vs i3-10300 - Doom GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-11600K i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

14700 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2992 Pts
2690 Pts

Doom

i5-11600K vs i3-10300 in Doom using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-11600K i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
90.3 FPS
1080p
83.9 FPS
1440p
63.5 FPS
1440p
58.9 FPS
2160p
32.7 FPS
2160p
30.4 FPS
w1440p
51.5 FPS
w1440p
47.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
144.6 FPS
1080p
135.9 FPS
1440p
107.3 FPS
1440p
100.6 FPS
2160p
60.7 FPS
2160p
56.9 FPS
w1440p
89.7 FPS
w1440p
84.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
198.9 FPS
1080p
187.9 FPS
1440p
151.0 FPS
1440p
142.3 FPS
2160p
88.6 FPS
2160p
83.5 FPS
w1440p
127.9 FPS
w1440p
120.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
307.4 FPS
1080p
291.8 FPS
1440p
238.6 FPS
1440p
225.7 FPS
2160p
144.5 FPS
2160p
136.6 FPS
w1440p
204.3 FPS
w1440p
193.1 FPS
i5-11600K
    i3-10300
    • The i3-10300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare i5-11600K vs i3-10300 specifications

    i5-11600K vs i3-10300 Architecture

    i5-11600K i3-10300

    i5-11600K vs i3-10300 Cache

    i5-11600K i3-10300

    i5-11600K vs i3-10300 Cores

    i5-11600K i3-10300

    i5-11600K vs i3-10300 Features

    i5-11600K i3-10300

    i5-11600K vs i3-10300 Notes

    i5-11600K i3-10300

    i5-11600K vs i3-10300 Performance

    i5-11600K i3-10300
    Frequency3.9 GHz3.70 GHz
    TDP125 W65 W

    i5-11600K vs i3-10300 Physical

    i5-11600K i3-10300

    Compare i5-11600K vs i3-10300 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments