i5-11400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core - Doom GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-11400 FX-6200 Six-Core

Multi-Thread Performance

14000 Pts
6126 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2700 Pts
1306 Pts

Doom

i5-11400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core in Doom using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-11400 FX-6200 Six-Core

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
89.5 FPS
1080p
40.9 FPS
1440p
62.9 FPS
1440p
28.7 FPS
2160p
32.4 FPS
2160p
14.8 FPS
w1440p
51.0 FPS
w1440p
23.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
143.5 FPS
1080p
73.6 FPS
1440p
106.4 FPS
1440p
54.2 FPS
2160p
60.2 FPS
2160p
30.4 FPS
w1440p
88.9 FPS
w1440p
45.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
197.5 FPS
1080p
106.3 FPS
1440p
149.9 FPS
1440p
79.7 FPS
2160p
88.0 FPS
2160p
46.0 FPS
w1440p
126.9 FPS
w1440p
67.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
305.5 FPS
1080p
171.6 FPS
1440p
236.9 FPS
1440p
130.6 FPS
2160p
143.5 FPS
2160p
77.2 FPS
w1440p
202.8 FPS
w1440p
110.9 FPS
i5-11400
    FX-6200 Six-Core

      Compare i5-11400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core specifications

      i5-11400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core Architecture

      i5-11400 FX-6200 Six-Core

      i5-11400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core Cache

      i5-11400 FX-6200 Six-Core

      i5-11400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core Cores

      i5-11400 FX-6200 Six-Core

      i5-11400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core Features

      i5-11400 FX-6200 Six-Core

      i5-11400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core Notes

      i5-11400 FX-6200 Six-Core

      i5-11400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core Performance

      i5-11400 FX-6200 Six-Core

      i5-11400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core Physical

      i5-11400 FX-6200 Six-Core

      Compare i5-11400 vs FX-6200 Six-Core in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments