i5-10400 vs Athlon II X2 220 - Doom Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 Athlon II X2 220

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
1634 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
933 Pts

Doom

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X2 220 in Doom using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 Athlon II X2 220

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
96.9 FPS
1080p
33.5 FPS
1440p
71.4 FPS
1440p
24.7 FPS
2160p
37.1 FPS
2160p
12.8 FPS
w1440p
58.1 FPS
w1440p
20.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
153.4 FPS
1080p
61.9 FPS
1440p
118.5 FPS
1440p
47.6 FPS
2160p
67.7 FPS
2160p
26.7 FPS
w1440p
99.4 FPS
w1440p
39.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
210.0 FPS
1080p
90.4 FPS
1440p
165.6 FPS
1440p
70.4 FPS
2160p
98.2 FPS
2160p
40.7 FPS
w1440p
140.8 FPS
w1440p
59.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
323.1 FPS
1080p
147.3 FPS
1440p
259.9 FPS
1440p
116.1 FPS
2160p
159.3 FPS
2160p
68.6 FPS
w1440p
223.4 FPS
w1440p
98.2 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-10400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 220
  • The Athlon II X2 220 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Athlon II X2 220 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-10400 vs Athlon II X2 220 specifications

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X2 220 Architecture

i5-10400 Athlon II X2 220
CodenameComet LakeRegor
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX220OCK22GM
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020Sep 2010

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X2 220 Cache

i5-10400 Athlon II X2 220
Cache L164K (per core)128K
Cache L2256K (per core)512K

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X2 220 Cores

i5-10400 Athlon II X2 220
# of Cores62
# of Threads122
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X2 220 Features

i5-10400 Athlon II X2 220
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X2 220 Notes

i5-10400 Athlon II X2 220

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X2 220 Performance

i5-10400 Athlon II X2 220
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplier29.0x14.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.15 V

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X2 220 Physical

i5-10400 Athlon II X2 220
Die Sizeunknown117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1200µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown410 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-10400 vs Athlon II X2 220 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments