i3-9320 vs i5-12400 - Doom Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 i5-12400

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
16800 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
3240 Pts

Doom

i3-9320 vs i5-12400 in Doom using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 i5-12400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
115.8 FPS
1080p
128.3 FPS
1440p
84.0 FPS
1440p
93.1 FPS
2160p
43.5 FPS
2160p
48.2 FPS
w1440p
68.2 FPS
w1440p
75.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
178.2 FPS
1080p
194.2 FPS
1440p
136.0 FPS
1440p
148.4 FPS
2160p
77.6 FPS
2160p
84.7 FPS
w1440p
114.0 FPS
w1440p
124.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
240.6 FPS
1080p
260.0 FPS
1440p
188.0 FPS
1440p
203.6 FPS
2160p
111.7 FPS
2160p
121.3 FPS
w1440p
159.8 FPS
w1440p
173.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
365.5 FPS
1080p
391.7 FPS
1440p
292.1 FPS
1440p
314.1 FPS
2160p
179.9 FPS
2160p
194.4 FPS
w1440p
251.3 FPS
w1440p
270.8 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9320 vs i5-12400 specifications

i3-9320 vs i5-12400 Architecture

i3-9320 i5-12400
CodenameCoffee LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i5 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRL4V SRL5Y
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-9320 vs i5-12400 Cache

i3-9320 i5-12400
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)18MB (shared)

i3-9320 vs i5-12400 Cores

i3-9320 i5-12400
# of Cores46
# of Threads412
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9320 vs i5-12400 Performance

i3-9320 i5-12400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier37.0x25.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP62 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i3-9320 vs i5-12400 Physical

i3-9320 i5-12400
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700

Compare i3-9320 vs i5-12400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments