i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core - Doom Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7320 FX-8320 Eight-Core

Multi-Thread Performance

6541 Pts
8017 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2364 Pts
1397 Pts

Doom

i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core in Doom using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7320 FX-8320 Eight-Core

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
99.2 FPS
1080p
73.7 FPS
1440p
72.0 FPS
1440p
53.5 FPS
2160p
37.2 FPS
2160p
27.7 FPS
w1440p
58.4 FPS
w1440p
43.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
156.5 FPS
1080p
121.7 FPS
1440p
119.4 FPS
1440p
92.7 FPS
2160p
67.8 FPS
2160p
52.5 FPS
w1440p
99.9 FPS
w1440p
77.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
213.8 FPS
1080p
169.8 FPS
1440p
166.7 FPS
1440p
131.8 FPS
2160p
98.4 FPS
2160p
77.4 FPS
w1440p
141.3 FPS
w1440p
111.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
328.4 FPS
1080p
265.9 FPS
1440p
261.4 FPS
1440p
210.2 FPS
2160p
159.6 FPS
2160p
127.0 FPS
w1440p
224.3 FPS
w1440p
179.6 FPS
i3-7320
    FX-8320 Eight-Core

      Compare i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core specifications

      i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Architecture

      i3-7320 FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Cache

      i3-7320 FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Cores

      i3-7320 FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Features

      i3-7320 FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Performance

      i3-7320 FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Physical

      i3-7320 FX-8320 Eight-Core

      Compare i3-7320 vs FX-8320 Eight-Core in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments