i3-12300 vs i3-10100 - Doom GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2531 Pts

Doom

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in Doom using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
87.2 FPS
1080p
82.2 FPS
1440p
61.2 FPS
1440p
57.7 FPS
2160p
31.6 FPS
2160p
29.8 FPS
w1440p
49.6 FPS
w1440p
46.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
140.4 FPS
1080p
133.5 FPS
1440p
103.9 FPS
1440p
98.8 FPS
2160p
58.9 FPS
2160p
56.0 FPS
w1440p
86.8 FPS
w1440p
82.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
193.6 FPS
1080p
184.9 FPS
1440p
146.7 FPS
1440p
140.0 FPS
2160p
86.2 FPS
2160p
82.1 FPS
w1440p
124.1 FPS
w1440p
118.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
299.9 FPS
1080p
287.6 FPS
1440p
232.2 FPS
1440p
222.3 FPS
2160p
140.8 FPS
2160p
134.5 FPS
w1440p
198.6 FPS
w1440p
190.1 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-12300 i3-10100
Frequency3.5 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-12300 i3-10100

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments