i3-12300 vs Phenom II X6 1035T - Doom Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 Phenom II X6 1035T

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
4665 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
1014 Pts

Doom

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X6 1035T in Doom using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 Phenom II X6 1035T

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
96.1 FPS
1080p
43.7 FPS
1440p
70.8 FPS
1440p
32.2 FPS
2160p
36.7 FPS
2160p
16.7 FPS
w1440p
57.5 FPS
w1440p
26.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
152.4 FPS
1080p
77.9 FPS
1440p
117.7 FPS
1440p
59.9 FPS
2160p
67.0 FPS
2160p
33.8 FPS
w1440p
98.6 FPS
w1440p
49.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
208.7 FPS
1080p
112.1 FPS
1440p
164.5 FPS
1440p
87.5 FPS
2160p
97.3 FPS
2160p
50.9 FPS
w1440p
139.6 FPS
w1440p
73.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
321.2 FPS
1080p
180.5 FPS
1440p
258.3 FPS
1440p
142.8 FPS
2160p
158.0 FPS
2160p
85.0 FPS
w1440p
221.7 FPS
w1440p
121.3 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X6 1035T
  • The Phenom II X6 1035T has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X6 1035T has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Phenom II X6 1035T has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-12300 vs Phenom II X6 1035T specifications

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X6 1035T Architecture

i3-12300 Phenom II X6 1035T
CodenameAlder Lake-SThuban
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Phenom II X6 (Thuban)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL61HDT35TWFK6DGRHDT35TWFGRBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X6 1035T Cache

i3-12300 Phenom II X6 1035T
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X6 1035T Cores

i3-12300 Phenom II X6 1035T
# of Cores46
# of Threads86
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X6 1035T Performance

i3-12300 Phenom II X6 1035T
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Multiplier35.0x13.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 3.1 GHz

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X6 1035T Physical

i3-12300 Phenom II X6 1035T
Die Size163 mm²346 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i3-12300 vs Phenom II X6 1035T in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments