Ryzen 5 3500 vs Core2 Duo E6420 - Doom TITAN V - Game Performance Benchmarks


Ryzen 5 3500 Core2 Duo E6420

Multi-Thread Performance

1655 Pts
1361 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2820 Pts
807 Pts

Doom

Ryzen 5 3500 vs Core2 Duo E6420 in Doom using TITAN V - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Ryzen 5 3500 Core2 Duo E6420

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
FPS
1080p
FPS
1440p
FPS
1440p
FPS
2160p
122.6 FPS
2160p
46.3 FPS
w1440p
FPS
w1440p
FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
nan FPS
1080p
nan FPS
1440p
nan FPS
1440p
nan FPS
2160p
186.9 FPS
2160p
81.9 FPS
w1440p
nan FPS
w1440p
nan FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
nan FPS
1080p
nan FPS
1440p
nan FPS
1440p
nan FPS
2160p
251.3 FPS
2160p
117.4 FPS
w1440p
nan FPS
w1440p
nan FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
nan FPS
1080p
nan FPS
1440p
nan FPS
1440p
nan FPS
2160p
379.9 FPS
2160p
188.6 FPS
w1440p
nan FPS
w1440p
nan FPS
Ryzen 5 3500
  • The Ryzen 5 3500 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The Ryzen 5 3500 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Core2 Duo E6420
  • The Core2 Duo E6420 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Core2 Duo E6420 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Core2 Duo E6420 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare Ryzen 5 3500 vs Core2 Duo E6420 specifications

Ryzen 5 3500 vs Core2 Duo E6420 Architecture

Ryzen 5 3500 Core2 Duo E6420
CodenameZen 2Conroe
GenerationRyzen 5 (Zen 2)Core 2 Duo (Conroe)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Part#unknownSLA4T
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedJul 2019Apr 2007

Ryzen 5 3500 vs Core2 Duo E6420 Cache

Ryzen 5 3500 Core2 Duo E6420
Cache L196K (per core)64K
Cache L2512K (per core)4MB

Ryzen 5 3500 vs Core2 Duo E6420 Cores

Ryzen 5 3500 Core2 Duo E6420
# of Cores62
# of Threads122
Integrated GraphicsN/AN/A
SMP # CPUs11

Ryzen 5 3500 vs Core2 Duo E6420 Performance

Ryzen 5 3500 Core2 Duo E6420
Base Clock100 MHz266 MHz
Frequency3.6 GHz2.133 GHz
Multiplier36.0x8.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.2 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.2 V

Ryzen 5 3500 vs Core2 Duo E6420 Physical

Ryzen 5 3500 Core2 Duo E6420
Die Sizeunknown111 mm²
FoundryTSMCIntel
PackageFC-LGA6
Process Size7 nm65 nm
SocketAMD Socket AM4Intel Socket 775
Transistors4,800 million167 million
tCaseMaxunknownunknown

Compare Ryzen 5 3500 vs Core2 Duo E6420 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments