Ryzen 5 1600 vs E2-3200 APU - Doom RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh - Game Performance Benchmarks


Ryzen 5 1600 E2-3200 APU

Multi-Thread Performance

12265 Pts
1428 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

1821 Pts
796 Pts

Doom

Ryzen 5 1600 vs E2-3200 APU in Doom using RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Ryzen 5 1600 E2-3200 APU

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
88.8 FPS
1080p
32.5 FPS
1440p
57.8 FPS
1440p
21.2 FPS
2160p
30.0 FPS
2160p
11.0 FPS
w1440p
47.0 FPS
w1440p
17.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
142.6 FPS
1080p
60.3 FPS
1440p
99.0 FPS
1440p
41.6 FPS
2160p
56.3 FPS
2160p
23.4 FPS
w1440p
82.9 FPS
w1440p
34.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
196.3 FPS
1080p
88.2 FPS
1440p
140.2 FPS
1440p
62.0 FPS
2160p
82.6 FPS
2160p
35.8 FPS
w1440p
118.9 FPS
w1440p
52.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
303.8 FPS
1080p
143.9 FPS
1440p
222.6 FPS
1440p
102.9 FPS
2160p
135.2 FPS
2160p
60.6 FPS
w1440p
190.7 FPS
w1440p
87.1 FPS
Ryzen 5 1600
    E2-3200 APU

      Compare Ryzen 5 1600 vs E2-3200 APU specifications

      Ryzen 5 1600 vs E2-3200 APU Architecture

      Ryzen 5 1600 E2-3200 APU

      Ryzen 5 1600 vs E2-3200 APU Cache

      Ryzen 5 1600 E2-3200 APU

      Ryzen 5 1600 vs E2-3200 APU Cores

      Ryzen 5 1600 E2-3200 APU

      Ryzen 5 1600 vs E2-3200 APU Features

      Ryzen 5 1600 E2-3200 APU

      Ryzen 5 1600 vs E2-3200 APU Notes

      Ryzen 5 1600 E2-3200 APU

      Ryzen 5 1600 vs E2-3200 APU Performance

      Ryzen 5 1600 E2-3200 APU

      Ryzen 5 1600 vs E2-3200 APU Physical

      Ryzen 5 1600 E2-3200 APU

      Compare Ryzen 5 1600 vs E2-3200 APU in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments