i9-10900K vs i3-550 - Dishonored 2 RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i3-550

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
2826 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1297 Pts

Dishonored 2

i9-10900K vs i3-550 in Dishonored 2 using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-550

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
101.1 FPS
1080p
29.1 FPS
1440p
86.6 FPS
1440p
24.9 FPS
2160p
71.2 FPS
2160p
20.5 FPS
w1440p
84.4 FPS
w1440p
24.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
159.0 FPS
1080p
54.8 FPS
1440p
139.6 FPS
1440p
47.9 FPS
2160p
118.2 FPS
2160p
40.4 FPS
w1440p
136.6 FPS
w1440p
46.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
216.9 FPS
1080p
80.6 FPS
1440p
192.5 FPS
1440p
70.9 FPS
2160p
165.3 FPS
2160p
60.3 FPS
w1440p
188.7 FPS
w1440p
69.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
332.8 FPS
1080p
132.0 FPS
1440p
298.5 FPS
1440p
116.9 FPS
2160p
259.3 FPS
2160p
100.2 FPS
w1440p
293.1 FPS
w1440p
114.6 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i9-10900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-550
  • The i3-550 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-550 specifications

i9-10900K vs i3-550 Architecture

i9-10900K i3-550
CodenameComet LakeClarkdale
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Clarkdale)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownSLBUD
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020May 2010

i9-10900K vs i3-550 Cache

i9-10900K i3-550
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i3-550 Cores

i9-10900K i3-550
# of Cores102
# of Threads204
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630Intel HD
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i3-550 Features

i9-10900K i3-550
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4 SSE4.1 SSE4.2 Intel 64 HTT VT-x XD-Bit

i9-10900K vs i3-550 Notes

i9-10900K i3-550

i9-10900K vs i3-550 Performance

i9-10900K i3-550
Base Clock100 MHz133 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier37.0x24.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W73 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.4 V

i9-10900K vs i3-550 Physical

i9-10900K i3-550
Die Sizeunknown81 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA10
Process Size14 nm32 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1156
Transistorsunknown382 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-550 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments