i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500 - Dead Space RTX 3080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K Ryzen 5 3500

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
1655 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2820 Pts

Dead Space

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500 in Dead Space using RTX 3080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 3500

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
86.6 FPS
1080p
81.1 FPS
1440p
57.7 FPS
1440p
54.1 FPS
2160p
23.1 FPS
2160p
21.6 FPS
w1440p
43.2 FPS
w1440p
40.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
139.6 FPS
1080p
132.0 FPS
1440p
98.8 FPS
1440p
93.6 FPS
2160p
44.9 FPS
2160p
42.3 FPS
w1440p
77.1 FPS
w1440p
73.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
192.5 FPS
1080p
183.0 FPS
1440p
140.0 FPS
1440p
133.0 FPS
2160p
66.6 FPS
2160p
63.0 FPS
w1440p
111.1 FPS
w1440p
105.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
298.5 FPS
1080p
284.8 FPS
1440p
222.3 FPS
1440p
211.9 FPS
2160p
110.1 FPS
2160p
104.4 FPS
w1440p
178.9 FPS
w1440p
170.4 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Ryzen 5 3500
  • The Ryzen 5 3500 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The Ryzen 5 3500 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500 specifications

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500 Architecture

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 3500
CodenameComet LakeZen 2
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Ryzen 5 (Zen 2)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Jul 2019

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500 Cache

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 3500
Cache L164K (per core)96K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)32MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500 Cores

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 3500
# of Cores106
# of Threads2012
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500 Features

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 3500

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500 Notes

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 3500

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500 Performance

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 3500
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier37.0x36.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 4.2 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500 Physical

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 3500
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelTSMC
PackageFC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm7 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM4
Transistorsunknown4,800 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments