i5-9600KF vs Athlon II X2 260 - Dead Space R9 390 - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-9600KF Athlon II X2 260

Multi-Thread Performance

13507 Pts
1873 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2735 Pts
1074 Pts

Dead Space

i5-9600KF vs Athlon II X2 260 in Dead Space using R9 390 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-9600KF Athlon II X2 260

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
33.9 FPS
1080p
15.5 FPS
1440p
21.9 FPS
1440p
10.3 FPS
2160p
8.8 FPS
2160p
4.1 FPS
w1440p
16.4 FPS
w1440p
7.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
62.6 FPS
1080p
31.6 FPS
1440p
42.8 FPS
1440p
22.1 FPS
2160p
19.2 FPS
2160p
9.7 FPS
w1440p
33.3 FPS
w1440p
17.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
91.3 FPS
1080p
47.8 FPS
1440p
63.7 FPS
1440p
33.9 FPS
2160p
29.6 FPS
2160p
15.4 FPS
w1440p
50.1 FPS
w1440p
26.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
148.6 FPS
1080p
80.1 FPS
1440p
105.6 FPS
1440p
57.4 FPS
2160p
50.5 FPS
2160p
26.6 FPS
w1440p
83.8 FPS
w1440p
45.2 FPS
i5-9600KF
  • The i5-9600KF is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-9600KF has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 260
  • The Athlon II X2 260 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Athlon II X2 260 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Athlon II X2 260 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i5-9600KF vs Athlon II X2 260 specifications

i5-9600KF vs Athlon II X2 260 Architecture

i5-9600KF Athlon II X2 260
CodenameCoffee LakeRegor
GenerationCore i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#BX80684I59600KFBXC80684I5960KFSRFADADX260OCK23GM
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedJan 2019May 2010

i5-9600KF vs Athlon II X2 260 Cache

i5-9600KF Athlon II X2 260
Cache L164K (per core)128K
Cache L2256K (per core)1MB

i5-9600KF vs Athlon II X2 260 Cores

i5-9600KF Athlon II X2 260
# of Cores62
# of Threads62
Integrated GraphicsN/AN/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-9600KF vs Athlon II X2 260 Performance

i5-9600KF Athlon II X2 260
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier37.0x16.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP95 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.6 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.15 V

i5-9600KF vs Athlon II X2 260 Physical

i5-9600KF Athlon II X2 260
Die Sizeunknown117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1151µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown410 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-9600KF vs Athlon II X2 260 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments