i5-11400 vs Athlon II X4 620 - Dead Space RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-11400 Athlon II X4 620

Multi-Thread Performance

14000 Pts
2938 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2700 Pts
906 Pts

Dead Space

i5-11400 vs Athlon II X4 620 in Dead Space using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-11400 Athlon II X4 620

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.4 FPS
1080p
26.7 FPS
1440p
46.3 FPS
1440p
17.8 FPS
2160p
18.5 FPS
2160p
7.1 FPS
w1440p
34.7 FPS
w1440p
13.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
115.7 FPS
1080p
50.9 FPS
1440p
81.9 FPS
1440p
35.7 FPS
2160p
37.0 FPS
2160p
15.9 FPS
w1440p
63.9 FPS
w1440p
27.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
162.0 FPS
1080p
75.1 FPS
1440p
117.4 FPS
1440p
53.7 FPS
2160p
55.4 FPS
2160p
24.7 FPS
w1440p
93.0 FPS
w1440p
42.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
254.6 FPS
1080p
123.4 FPS
1440p
188.6 FPS
1440p
89.5 FPS
2160p
92.3 FPS
2160p
42.2 FPS
w1440p
151.3 FPS
w1440p
70.8 FPS
i5-11400
  • The i5-11400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-11400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-11400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-11400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X4 620
  • The Athlon II X4 620 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i5-11400 vs Athlon II X4 620 specifications

i5-11400 vs Athlon II X4 620 Architecture

i5-11400 Athlon II X4 620
CodenameRocket LakePropus
GenerationCore i5 (Rocket Lake-S) Athlon II X4 (Propus)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX620WFK42GIADX620WFGIBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMar 16th, 2021Sep 2009

i5-11400 vs Athlon II X4 620 Cache

i5-11400 Athlon II X4 620
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)

i5-11400 vs Athlon II X4 620 Cores

i5-11400 Athlon II X4 620
# of Cores64
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-11400 vs Athlon II X4 620 Features

i5-11400 Athlon II X4 620
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i5-11400 vs Athlon II X4 620 Notes

i5-11400 Athlon II X4 620

i5-11400 vs Athlon II X4 620 Performance

i5-11400 Athlon II X4 620
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency2.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Multiplier26.0x13.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.425 V

i5-11400 vs Athlon II X4 620 Physical

i5-11400 Athlon II X4 620
Die Sizeunknown169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1200µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown300 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-11400 vs Athlon II X4 620 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments