i3-9320 vs i9-13900K - Dead Space Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 i9-13900K

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
34549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
4683 Pts

Dead Space

i3-9320 vs i9-13900K in Dead Space using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 i9-13900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
32.5 FPS
1080p
39.5 FPS
1440p
21.7 FPS
1440p
25.2 FPS
2160p
8.6 FPS
2160p
10.0 FPS
w1440p
16.3 FPS
w1440p
18.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
60.3 FPS
1080p
71.4 FPS
1440p
42.5 FPS
1440p
48.4 FPS
2160p
18.8 FPS
2160p
21.5 FPS
w1440p
33.1 FPS
w1440p
37.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
88.2 FPS
1080p
103.3 FPS
1440p
63.3 FPS
1440p
71.6 FPS
2160p
29.1 FPS
2160p
33.0 FPS
w1440p
49.9 FPS
w1440p
56.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
143.9 FPS
1080p
167.1 FPS
1440p
104.8 FPS
1440p
118.0 FPS
2160p
49.5 FPS
2160p
56.1 FPS
w1440p
83.4 FPS
w1440p
93.5 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i9-13900K
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9320 vs i9-13900K specifications

i3-9320 vs i9-13900K Architecture

i3-9320 i9-13900K
CodenameCoffee LakeRaptor Lake-S
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i9 (Raptor Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRMBH
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-9320 vs i9-13900K Cache

i3-9320 i9-13900K
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2MB (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)36MB (shared)

i3-9320 vs i9-13900K Cores

i3-9320 i9-13900K
# of Cores424
# of Threads432
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9320 vs i9-13900K Performance

i3-9320 i9-13900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier37.0x30.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP62 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 5.8 GHz

i3-9320 vs i9-13900K Physical

i3-9320 i9-13900K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i3-9320 vs i9-13900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments