i3-9320 vs Athlon II X3 435 - Dead Space GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 Athlon II X3 435

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
2472 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
1004 Pts

Dead Space

i3-9320 vs Athlon II X3 435 in Dead Space using GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 Athlon II X3 435

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
33.2 FPS
1080p
15.2 FPS
1440p
22.2 FPS
1440p
10.2 FPS
2160p
8.9 FPS
2160p
4.1 FPS
w1440p
16.6 FPS
w1440p
7.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
61.5 FPS
1080p
31.1 FPS
1440p
43.3 FPS
1440p
21.9 FPS
2160p
19.4 FPS
2160p
9.7 FPS
w1440p
33.6 FPS
w1440p
16.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
89.7 FPS
1080p
47.0 FPS
1440p
64.5 FPS
1440p
33.6 FPS
2160p
29.9 FPS
2160p
15.4 FPS
w1440p
50.6 FPS
w1440p
26.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
146.3 FPS
1080p
78.8 FPS
1440p
106.7 FPS
1440p
57.0 FPS
2160p
50.9 FPS
2160p
26.6 FPS
w1440p
84.6 FPS
w1440p
44.7 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X3 435
  • The Athlon II X3 435 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Athlon II X3 435 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Athlon II X3 435 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9320 vs Athlon II X3 435 specifications

i3-9320 vs Athlon II X3 435 Architecture

i3-9320 Athlon II X3 435
CodenameCoffee LakeRana
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Athlon II X3 (Rana)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX435WFK32GIADX435WFGIBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedApr 2019Oct 2009

i3-9320 vs Athlon II X3 435 Cache

i3-9320 Athlon II X3 435
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)

i3-9320 vs Athlon II X3 435 Cores

i3-9320 Athlon II X3 435
# of Cores43
# of Threads43
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9320 vs Athlon II X3 435 Performance

i3-9320 Athlon II X3 435
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier37.0x14.5x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP62 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.425 V

i3-9320 vs Athlon II X3 435 Physical

i3-9320 Athlon II X3 435
Die Sizeunknown169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1151µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown300 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i3-9320 vs Athlon II X3 435 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments