i3-9100 vs i5-10600K - Dead Space RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9100 i5-10600K

Multi-Thread Performance

9095 Pts
14000 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2411 Pts
2850 Pts

Dead Space

i3-9100 vs i5-10600K in Dead Space using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9100 i5-10600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
62.4 FPS
1080p
68.8 FPS
1440p
41.7 FPS
1440p
45.9 FPS
2160p
16.6 FPS
2160p
18.3 FPS
w1440p
31.2 FPS
w1440p
34.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
105.7 FPS
1080p
114.8 FPS
1440p
74.8 FPS
1440p
81.3 FPS
2160p
33.6 FPS
2160p
36.6 FPS
w1440p
58.2 FPS
w1440p
63.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
149.0 FPS
1080p
160.9 FPS
1440p
107.9 FPS
1440p
116.6 FPS
2160p
50.6 FPS
2160p
54.9 FPS
w1440p
85.3 FPS
w1440p
92.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
235.5 FPS
1080p
252.9 FPS
1440p
174.2 FPS
1440p
187.3 FPS
2160p
84.6 FPS
2160p
91.5 FPS
w1440p
139.4 FPS
w1440p
150.0 FPS
i3-9100
  • The i3-9100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-10600K
  • The i5-10600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-10600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-10600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-9100 vs i5-10600K specifications

i3-9100 vs i5-10600K Architecture

i3-9100 i5-10600K
CodenameCoffee LakeComet Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i5 (Comet Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#SR3XQunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedSep 2018May 2020

i3-9100 vs i5-10600K Cache

i3-9100 i5-10600K
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i3-9100 vs i5-10600K Cores

i3-9100 i5-10600K
# of Cores46
# of Threads412
Integrated GraphicsN/AUHD Graphics 630
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9100 vs i5-10600K Performance

i3-9100 i5-10600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier37.0x41.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP65 W95 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 4.8 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i3-9100 vs i5-10600K Physical

i3-9100 i5-10600K
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1200
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i3-9100 vs i5-10600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments