i3-8300 vs i3-12300 - Dead Space Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-8300 i3-12300

Multi-Thread Performance

8715 Pts
14493 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2172 Pts
3550 Pts

Dead Space

i3-8300 vs i3-12300 in Dead Space using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-8300 i3-12300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
31.2 FPS
1080p
34.9 FPS
1440p
20.9 FPS
1440p
23.3 FPS
2160p
8.3 FPS
2160p
9.3 FPS
w1440p
15.6 FPS
w1440p
17.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
58.2 FPS
1080p
64.2 FPS
1440p
41.1 FPS
1440p
45.2 FPS
2160p
18.2 FPS
2160p
20.2 FPS
w1440p
31.8 FPS
w1440p
35.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
85.3 FPS
1080p
93.4 FPS
1440p
61.3 FPS
1440p
67.1 FPS
2160p
28.2 FPS
2160p
31.1 FPS
w1440p
48.1 FPS
w1440p
52.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
139.4 FPS
1080p
152.0 FPS
1440p
101.7 FPS
1440p
110.9 FPS
2160p
48.1 FPS
2160p
52.8 FPS
w1440p
80.5 FPS
w1440p
88.3 FPS
i3-8300
  • The i3-8300 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-8300 vs i3-12300 specifications

i3-8300 vs i3-12300 Architecture

i3-8300 i3-12300
CodenameCoffee LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake)Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#SR3XYSRL61
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-8300 vs i3-12300 Cache

i3-8300 i3-12300
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L38MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i3-8300 vs i3-12300 Cores

i3-8300 i3-12300
# of Cores44
# of Threads48
Integrated GraphicsN/AUHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i3-8300 vs i3-12300 Features

i3-8300 i3-12300

i3-8300 vs i3-12300 Performance

i3-8300 i3-12300
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier37.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP62 W60 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 4.4 GHz

i3-8300 vs i3-12300 Physical

i3-8300 i3-12300
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700

Compare i3-8300 vs i3-12300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments