i3-12100 vs i5-9600KF - Dead Space R7 370 - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i5-9600KF

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
13507 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2735 Pts

Dead Space

i3-12100 vs i5-9600KF in Dead Space using R7 370 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i5-9600KF

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
16.2 FPS
1080p
16.4 FPS
1440p
10.5 FPS
1440p
10.5 FPS
2160p
4.2 FPS
2160p
4.2 FPS
w1440p
7.8 FPS
w1440p
7.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
32.9 FPS
1080p
33.3 FPS
1440p
22.5 FPS
1440p
22.5 FPS
2160p
9.9 FPS
2160p
9.9 FPS
w1440p
17.3 FPS
w1440p
17.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
49.6 FPS
1080p
50.1 FPS
1440p
34.4 FPS
1440p
34.4 FPS
2160p
15.7 FPS
2160p
15.7 FPS
w1440p
26.7 FPS
w1440p
27.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
83.0 FPS
1080p
83.8 FPS
1440p
58.3 FPS
1440p
58.3 FPS
2160p
27.2 FPS
2160p
27.2 FPS
w1440p
45.7 FPS
w1440p
46.1 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i5-9600KF
  • The i5-9600KF is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-9600KF has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-12100 vs i5-9600KF specifications

i3-12100 vs i5-9600KF Architecture

i3-12100 i5-9600KF
CodenameAlder Lake-SCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL62BX80684I59600KFBXC80684I5960KFSRFAD
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12100 vs i5-9600KF Cache

i3-12100 i5-9600KF
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)9MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i5-9600KF Cores

i3-12100 i5-9600KF
# of Cores46
# of Threads86
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i5-9600KF Performance

i3-12100 i5-9600KF
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier33.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP60 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 4.6 GHz

i3-12100 vs i5-9600KF Physical

i3-12100 i5-9600KF
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1151
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151

Compare i3-12100 vs i5-9600KF in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments