i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500X - Cyberpunk 2077 Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K Ryzen 5 3500X

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
1805 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2850 Pts

Cyberpunk 2077

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500X in Cyberpunk 2077 using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 3500X

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
24.8 FPS
1080p
23.5 FPS
1440p
22.8 FPS
1440p
21.6 FPS
2160p
14.8 FPS
2160p
14.0 FPS
w1440p
20.1 FPS
w1440p
19.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
47.7 FPS
1080p
45.5 FPS
1440p
44.4 FPS
1440p
42.3 FPS
2160p
30.4 FPS
2160p
28.9 FPS
w1440p
39.7 FPS
w1440p
38.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
70.6 FPS
1080p
67.6 FPS
1440p
65.9 FPS
1440p
63.0 FPS
2160p
46.0 FPS
2160p
43.9 FPS
w1440p
59.4 FPS
w1440p
56.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
116.5 FPS
1080p
111.6 FPS
1440p
109.0 FPS
1440p
104.4 FPS
2160p
77.2 FPS
2160p
73.8 FPS
w1440p
98.6 FPS
w1440p
94.7 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Ryzen 5 3500X
  • The Ryzen 5 3500X is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The Ryzen 5 3500X has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500X specifications

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500X Architecture

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 3500X
CodenameComet LakeZen 2
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Ryzen 5 (Zen 2)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Jul 2019

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500X Cache

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 3500X
Cache L164K (per core)96K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)32MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500X Cores

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 3500X
# of Cores106
# of Threads2012
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500X Features

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 3500X

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500X Notes

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 3500X

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500X Performance

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 3500X
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier37.0x36.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 4.2 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500X Physical

i9-10900K Ryzen 5 3500X
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelTSMC
PackageFC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm7 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM4
Transistorsunknown4,800 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-10900K vs Ryzen 5 3500X in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments