i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 435 - Cyberpunk 2077 Graphics 448SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K Athlon II X3 435

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
2472 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1004 Pts

Cyberpunk 2077

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 435 in Cyberpunk 2077 using Graphics 448SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 435

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
40.3 FPS
1080p
15.8 FPS
1440p
37.1 FPS
1440p
14.6 FPS
2160p
24.1 FPS
2160p
9.5 FPS
w1440p
32.7 FPS
w1440p
12.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
72.7 FPS
1080p
32.2 FPS
1440p
67.7 FPS
1440p
30.0 FPS
2160p
46.5 FPS
2160p
20.6 FPS
w1440p
60.7 FPS
w1440p
26.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
105.0 FPS
1080p
48.6 FPS
1440p
98.2 FPS
1440p
45.5 FPS
2160p
69.0 FPS
2160p
31.6 FPS
w1440p
88.6 FPS
w1440p
40.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
169.7 FPS
1080p
81.3 FPS
1440p
159.3 FPS
1440p
76.3 FPS
2160p
113.9 FPS
2160p
53.7 FPS
w1440p
144.5 FPS
w1440p
68.6 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i9-10900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X3 435
  • The Athlon II X3 435 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 435 specifications

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 435 Architecture

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 435
CodenameComet LakeRana
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Athlon II X3 (Rana)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX435WFK32GIADX435WFGIBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020Oct 2009

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 435 Cache

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 435
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 435 Cores

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 435
# of Cores103
# of Threads203
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 435 Features

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 435
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 435 Notes

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 435

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 435 Performance

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 435
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier37.0x14.5x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.425 V

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 435 Physical

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 435
Die Sizeunknown169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1200µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown300 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 435 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments