i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 255 - Cyberpunk 2077 RX 6650M - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K Athlon II X2 255

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
1848 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1046 Pts

Cyberpunk 2077

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 255 in Cyberpunk 2077 using RX 6650M - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 255

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
47.6 FPS
1080p
18.0 FPS
1440p
44.1 FPS
1440p
16.7 FPS
2160p
28.0 FPS
2160p
10.6 FPS
w1440p
38.6 FPS
w1440p
14.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
83.8 FPS
1080p
36.1 FPS
1440p
78.5 FPS
1440p
33.8 FPS
2160p
53.0 FPS
2160p
22.6 FPS
w1440p
70.0 FPS
w1440p
30.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
120.1 FPS
1080p
54.2 FPS
1440p
112.9 FPS
1440p
50.9 FPS
2160p
78.1 FPS
2160p
34.7 FPS
w1440p
101.4 FPS
w1440p
45.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
192.5 FPS
1080p
90.3 FPS
1440p
181.7 FPS
1440p
85.0 FPS
2160p
128.1 FPS
2160p
58.8 FPS
w1440p
164.2 FPS
w1440p
76.3 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i9-10900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 255
  • The Athlon II X2 255 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 255 specifications

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 255 Architecture

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 255
CodenameComet LakeRegor
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX255OCK23GQ
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020Jan 2010

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 255 Cache

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 255
Cache L164K (per core)128K
Cache L2256K (per core)1MB

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 255 Cores

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 255
# of Cores102
# of Threads202
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 255 Features

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 255
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 255 Notes

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 255

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 255 Performance

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 255
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.1 GHz
Multiplier37.0x15.5x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.15 V

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 255 Physical

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 255
Die Sizeunknown117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1200µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown410 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 255 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments