i9-10900K vs i3-9100 - Assassin's Creed Valhalla RTX 4080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i3-9100

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
9095 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2411 Pts

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

i9-10900K vs i3-9100 in Assassin's Creed Valhalla using RTX 4080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-9100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
98.0 FPS
1080p
86.7 FPS
1440p
84.7 FPS
1440p
74.9 FPS
2160p
57.4 FPS
2160p
50.8 FPS
w1440p
76.0 FPS
w1440p
67.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
154.9 FPS
1080p
139.7 FPS
1440p
137.0 FPS
1440p
123.4 FPS
2160p
98.4 FPS
2160p
88.6 FPS
w1440p
125.0 FPS
w1440p
112.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
211.8 FPS
1080p
192.7 FPS
1440p
189.2 FPS
1440p
172.0 FPS
2160p
139.4 FPS
2160p
126.5 FPS
w1440p
173.9 FPS
w1440p
157.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
325.6 FPS
1080p
298.7 FPS
1440p
293.8 FPS
1440p
269.0 FPS
2160p
221.4 FPS
2160p
202.2 FPS
w1440p
271.9 FPS
w1440p
248.6 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i3-9100
  • The i3-9100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-9100 specifications

i9-10900K vs i3-9100 Architecture

i9-10900K i3-9100
CodenameComet LakeCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownSR3XQ
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Sep 2018

i9-10900K vs i3-9100 Cache

i9-10900K i3-9100
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i3-9100 Cores

i9-10900K i3-9100
# of Cores104
# of Threads204
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i3-9100 Features

i9-10900K i3-9100

i9-10900K vs i3-9100 Notes

i9-10900K i3-9100

i9-10900K vs i3-9100 Performance

i9-10900K i3-9100
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier37.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariablevariable

i9-10900K vs i3-9100 Physical

i9-10900K i3-9100
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA1151
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1151
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-9100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments