i9-12900K vs Phenom II X4 820 - Ashes of the Singularity GTX 1070 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-12900K Phenom II X4 820

Multi-Thread Performance

28791 Pts
3409 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3903 Pts
978 Pts

Ashes of the Singularity

i9-12900K vs Phenom II X4 820 in Ashes of the Singularity using GTX 1070 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-12900K Phenom II X4 820

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
58.5 FPS
1080p
25.7 FPS
1440p
48.7 FPS
1440p
23.6 FPS
2160p
33.4 FPS
2160p
16.2 FPS
w1440p
43.9 FPS
w1440p
21.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
100.0 FPS
1080p
49.2 FPS
1440p
85.5 FPS
1440p
45.7 FPS
2160p
61.8 FPS
2160p
32.9 FPS
w1440p
78.2 FPS
w1440p
41.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
141.5 FPS
1080p
72.7 FPS
1440p
122.3 FPS
1440p
67.8 FPS
2160p
90.2 FPS
2160p
49.6 FPS
w1440p
112.5 FPS
w1440p
62.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
224.6 FPS
1080p
119.8 FPS
1440p
195.9 FPS
1440p
112.0 FPS
2160p
146.9 FPS
2160p
83.0 FPS
w1440p
181.1 FPS
w1440p
103.3 FPS
i9-12900K
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-12900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-12900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-12900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X4 820
  • The Phenom II X4 820 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X4 820 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-12900K vs Phenom II X4 820 specifications

i9-12900K vs Phenom II X4 820 Architecture

i9-12900K Phenom II X4 820
CodenameAlder LakeDeneb
GenerationCore i9 (Alder Lake-S)Phenom II X4 (Deneb)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channelDDR3
Part#unknownHDX820WFK4FGIHDX820WFGIBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i9-12900K vs Phenom II X4 820 Cache

i9-12900K Phenom II X4 820
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L214MB (shared)512K (per core)
Cache L330MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i9-12900K vs Phenom II X4 820 Cores

i9-12900K Phenom II X4 820
# of Cores164
# of Threads244
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-12900K vs Phenom II X4 820 Performance

i9-12900K Phenom II X4 820
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplier32.0x14.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.2 GHzN/A

i9-12900K vs Phenom II X4 820 Physical

i9-12900K Phenom II X4 820
Die Sizeunknown258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1700µPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown758 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-12900K vs Phenom II X4 820 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments