i9-13900K vs i5-12400 - Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation RX 6650M - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-13900K i5-12400

Multi-Thread Performance

34549 Pts
16800 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4683 Pts
3240 Pts

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

i9-13900K vs i5-12400 in Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation using RX 6650M - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-13900K i5-12400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
93.9 FPS
1080p
85.7 FPS
1440p
75.2 FPS
1440p
71.9 FPS
2160p
60.7 FPS
2160p
58.0 FPS
w1440p
72.7 FPS
w1440p
69.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
149.4 FPS
1080p
138.3 FPS
1440p
123.8 FPS
1440p
119.2 FPS
2160p
103.2 FPS
2160p
99.3 FPS
w1440p
120.3 FPS
w1440p
115.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
205.0 FPS
1080p
191.0 FPS
1440p
172.5 FPS
1440p
166.5 FPS
2160p
145.7 FPS
2160p
140.6 FPS
w1440p
168.0 FPS
w1440p
162.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
316.0 FPS
1080p
296.3 FPS
1440p
269.8 FPS
1440p
261.2 FPS
2160p
230.8 FPS
2160p
223.1 FPS
w1440p
263.3 FPS
w1440p
254.8 FPS
i9-13900K
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-13900K vs i5-12400 specifications

i9-13900K vs i5-12400 Architecture

i9-13900K i5-12400
ChipsetsZ690, Z790Z690, H670, B660, H610
CodenameRaptor Lake-SAlder Lake-S
DDR4 Speed3200 MT/s3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed5600 MT/s4800 MT/s
ECC MemoryYesNo
GenerationCore i9 (Raptor Lake)Core i5 (Alder Lake-S)
Launch MSRP$589$199
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)
Part#SRMBHSRL4V SRL5Y
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateSep 27th, 2022Jan 4th, 2022

i9-13900K vs i5-12400 Cache

i9-13900K i5-12400
Cache L180K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L22MB (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L336MB (shared)18MB (shared)

i9-13900K vs i5-12400 Cores

i9-13900K i5-12400
# of Cores246
# of Threads3212
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i9-13900K vs i5-12400 Performance

i9-13900K i5-12400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier30.0x25.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
PL1253 W65W
PL2253 W117W
PL2 Tau LimitUnlimited28 seconds
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.8 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i9-13900K vs i5-12400 Physical

i9-13900K i5-12400
Die Size257 mm²163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i9-13900K vs i5-12400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments