i3-9100F vs Phenom II X4 840 - Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9100F Phenom II X4 840

Multi-Thread Performance

8988 Pts
3511 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2343 Pts
1099 Pts

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

i3-9100F vs Phenom II X4 840 in Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9100F Phenom II X4 840

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
39.9 FPS
1080p
19.7 FPS
1440p
33.6 FPS
1440p
16.5 FPS
2160p
27.2 FPS
2160p
13.4 FPS
w1440p
32.5 FPS
w1440p
16.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
72.0 FPS
1080p
39.0 FPS
1440p
62.1 FPS
1440p
33.4 FPS
2160p
51.7 FPS
2160p
27.8 FPS
w1440p
60.3 FPS
w1440p
32.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
104.2 FPS
1080p
58.4 FPS
1440p
90.6 FPS
1440p
50.4 FPS
2160p
76.2 FPS
2160p
42.3 FPS
w1440p
88.2 FPS
w1440p
49.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
168.4 FPS
1080p
97.1 FPS
1440p
147.6 FPS
1440p
84.2 FPS
2160p
125.2 FPS
2160p
71.2 FPS
w1440p
143.9 FPS
w1440p
82.2 FPS
i3-9100F
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-9100F is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9100F has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i3-9100F has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X4 840
  • The Phenom II X4 840 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-9100F vs Phenom II X4 840 specifications

i3-9100F vs Phenom II X4 840 Architecture

i3-9100F Phenom II X4 840
CodenameCoffee LakePropus
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Phenom II X4 (Propus)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownHDX840WFK42GMHDX840WFGMBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedApr 2019Jan 2011

i3-9100F vs Phenom II X4 840 Cache

i3-9100F Phenom II X4 840
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)

i3-9100F vs Phenom II X4 840 Cores

i3-9100F Phenom II X4 840
# of Cores44
# of Threads44
Integrated GraphicsN/AN/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9100F vs Phenom II X4 840 Performance

i3-9100F Phenom II X4 840
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier36.0x16.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.2 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.4 V

i3-9100F vs Phenom II X4 840 Physical

i3-9100F Phenom II X4 840
Die Sizeunknown169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1151µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown300 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i3-9100F vs Phenom II X4 840 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments