i3-9100F vs Phenom II X3 705e - Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9100F Phenom II X3 705e

Multi-Thread Performance

8988 Pts
2227 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2343 Pts
844 Pts

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

i3-9100F vs Phenom II X3 705e in Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9100F Phenom II X3 705e

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.3 FPS
1080p
13.8 FPS
1440p
32.5 FPS
1440p
11.7 FPS
2160p
24.6 FPS
2160p
8.9 FPS
w1440p
30.6 FPS
w1440p
11.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.5 FPS
1080p
28.6 FPS
1440p
60.3 FPS
1440p
24.7 FPS
2160p
47.4 FPS
2160p
19.4 FPS
w1440p
57.3 FPS
w1440p
23.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
100.8 FPS
1080p
43.4 FPS
1440p
88.2 FPS
1440p
37.7 FPS
2160p
70.2 FPS
2160p
29.9 FPS
w1440p
83.9 FPS
w1440p
35.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
163.2 FPS
1080p
72.9 FPS
1440p
143.9 FPS
1440p
63.7 FPS
2160p
115.7 FPS
2160p
50.9 FPS
w1440p
137.3 FPS
w1440p
60.6 FPS
i3-9100F
  • The i3-9100F has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-9100F has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-9100F has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i3-9100F has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X3 705e
  • The Phenom II X3 705e has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-9100F vs Phenom II X3 705e specifications

i3-9100F vs Phenom II X3 705e Architecture

i3-9100F Phenom II X3 705e
CodenameCoffee LakeHeka
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Phenom II X3 (Heka)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownHD705EOCK3DGIHD705EOCGIBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedApr 2019Jun 2009

i3-9100F vs Phenom II X3 705e Cache

i3-9100F Phenom II X3 705e
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-9100F vs Phenom II X3 705e Cores

i3-9100F Phenom II X3 705e
# of Cores43
# of Threads43
Integrated GraphicsN/AN/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9100F vs Phenom II X3 705e Performance

i3-9100F Phenom II X3 705e
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier36.0x12.5x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.2 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.25 V

i3-9100F vs Phenom II X3 705e Physical

i3-9100F Phenom II X3 705e
Die Sizeunknown258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1151µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown758 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i3-9100F vs Phenom II X3 705e in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments