i3-12100 vs i3-9320 - Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation R9 FURY X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-9320

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
10144 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2552 Pts

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

i3-12100 vs i3-9320 in Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation using R9 FURY X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-9320

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
71.0 FPS
1080p
67.1 FPS
1440p
63.1 FPS
1440p
61.3 FPS
2160p
51.0 FPS
2160p
49.5 FPS
w1440p
61.1 FPS
w1440p
59.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
118.0 FPS
1080p
112.4 FPS
1440p
106.7 FPS
1440p
104.1 FPS
2160p
88.9 FPS
2160p
86.7 FPS
w1440p
103.8 FPS
w1440p
101.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
164.9 FPS
1080p
157.7 FPS
1440p
150.3 FPS
1440p
146.9 FPS
2160p
126.9 FPS
2160p
123.9 FPS
w1440p
146.5 FPS
w1440p
143.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
258.8 FPS
1080p
248.4 FPS
1440p
237.4 FPS
1440p
232.4 FPS
2160p
202.8 FPS
2160p
198.3 FPS
w1440p
231.9 FPS
w1440p
226.8 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-9320 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-9320 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-9320
CodenameAlder Lake-SCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL62unknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12100 vs i3-9320 Cache

i3-12100 i3-9320
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i3-9320 Cores

i3-12100 i3-9320
# of Cores44
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730UHD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i3-9320 Performance

i3-12100 i3-9320
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier33.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W62 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i3-12100 vs i3-9320 Physical

i3-12100 i3-9320
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1151
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-9320 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments