i3-12100 vs i3-6320 - Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-6320

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
6047 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2236 Pts

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

i3-12100 vs i3-6320 in Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation using RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-6320

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
130.0 FPS
1080p
79.5 FPS
1440p
111.5 FPS
1440p
68.1 FPS
2160p
94.2 FPS
2160p
57.6 FPS
w1440p
110.0 FPS
w1440p
67.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
196.3 FPS
1080p
129.8 FPS
1440p
172.7 FPS
1440p
113.8 FPS
2160p
149.8 FPS
2160p
98.7 FPS
w1440p
170.7 FPS
w1440p
112.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
262.6 FPS
1080p
180.1 FPS
1440p
233.8 FPS
1440p
159.6 FPS
2160p
205.5 FPS
2160p
139.8 FPS
w1440p
231.4 FPS
w1440p
158.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
395.2 FPS
1080p
280.8 FPS
1440p
356.1 FPS
1440p
251.1 FPS
2160p
316.7 FPS
2160p
222.0 FPS
w1440p
352.8 FPS
w1440p
248.9 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-6320
  • The i3-6320 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-6320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-6320 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-6320 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-6320
CodenameAlder Lake-SSkylake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Skylake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL62SR2H9
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12100 vs i3-6320 Cache

i3-12100 i3-6320
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i3-6320 Cores

i3-12100 i3-6320
# of Cores42
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 530
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i3-6320 Performance

i3-12100 i3-6320
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier33.0x39.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W51 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs i3-6320 Physical

i3-12100 i3-6320
Die Size163 mm²150 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-6320 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments