i9-12900K vs i5-10400 - Armored Core VI GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-12900K i5-10400

Multi-Thread Performance

28791 Pts
12716 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3903 Pts
2609 Pts

Armored Core VI

i9-12900K vs i5-10400 in Armored Core VI using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-12900K i5-10400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
33.2 FPS
1080p
30.8 FPS
1440p
26.2 FPS
1440p
24.9 FPS
2160p
14.5 FPS
2160p
13.8 FPS
w1440p
21.8 FPS
w1440p
20.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
61.5 FPS
1080p
57.6 FPS
1440p
50.1 FPS
1440p
47.9 FPS
2160p
29.8 FPS
2160p
28.6 FPS
w1440p
42.7 FPS
w1440p
40.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
89.7 FPS
1080p
84.4 FPS
1440p
73.9 FPS
1440p
70.9 FPS
2160p
45.2 FPS
2160p
43.4 FPS
w1440p
63.5 FPS
w1440p
60.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
146.3 FPS
1080p
138.0 FPS
1440p
121.6 FPS
1440p
116.9 FPS
2160p
75.9 FPS
2160p
72.9 FPS
w1440p
105.2 FPS
w1440p
101.0 FPS
i9-12900K
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-12900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-12900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-12900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i9-12900K vs i5-10400 specifications

i9-12900K vs i5-10400 Architecture

i9-12900K i5-10400
CodenameAlder LakeComet Lake
GenerationCore i9 (Alder Lake-S)Core i5 (Comet Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channelDDR4
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i9-12900K vs i5-10400 Cache

i9-12900K i5-10400
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L214MB (shared)256K (per core)
Cache L330MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i9-12900K vs i5-10400 Cores

i9-12900K i5-10400
# of Cores166
# of Threads2412
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770UHD Graphics 630
SMP # CPUs11

i9-12900K vs i5-10400 Performance

i9-12900K i5-10400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.2 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier32.0x29.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.2 GHzup to 4.3 GHz

i9-12900K vs i5-10400 Physical

i9-12900K i5-10400
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1700FC-LGA1200
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1200
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i9-12900K vs i5-10400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments