i9-12900K vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - Armored Core VI Graphics 448SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-12900K Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Multi-Thread Performance

28791 Pts
18511 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3903 Pts
1995 Pts

Armored Core VI

i9-12900K vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in Armored Core VI using Graphics 448SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-12900K Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
58.2 FPS
1080p
46.1 FPS
1440p
46.0 FPS
1440p
37.3 FPS
2160p
25.5 FPS
2160p
20.7 FPS
w1440p
38.2 FPS
w1440p
31.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
99.6 FPS
1080p
81.6 FPS
1440p
81.4 FPS
1440p
68.0 FPS
2160p
48.9 FPS
2160p
40.8 FPS
w1440p
69.4 FPS
w1440p
57.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
141.0 FPS
1080p
117.0 FPS
1440p
116.8 FPS
1440p
98.6 FPS
2160p
72.3 FPS
2160p
60.8 FPS
w1440p
100.6 FPS
w1440p
84.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
223.7 FPS
1080p
187.9 FPS
1440p
187.6 FPS
1440p
160.0 FPS
2160p
119.1 FPS
2160p
101.0 FPS
w1440p
162.9 FPS
w1440p
138.7 FPS
i9-12900K
  • The i9-12900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-12900K is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i9-12900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i9-12900K vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X specifications

i9-12900K vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Architecture

i9-12900K Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
CodenameAlder LakeZen
GenerationCore i9 (Alder Lake-S)Ryzen Threadripper (Zen)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channelDDR4
Part#unknownYD192XA8UC9AE
Production StatusActiveActive

i9-12900K vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Cache

i9-12900K Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Cache L164K (per core)96K (per core)
Cache L214MB (shared)512K (per core)
Cache L330MB (shared)32MB

i9-12900K vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Cores

i9-12900K Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
# of Cores1612
# of Threads2424
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-12900K vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Performance

i9-12900K Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier32.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP125 W180 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.2 GHzup to 4.2 GHz

i9-12900K vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Physical

i9-12900K Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Die Sizeunknown213 mm²
FoundryIntelGlobalFoundries
PackageFC-LGA1700FCLGA-4094
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket SP3r2
Transistorsunknown9600 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-12900K vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments