i5-12600K vs Athlon II X2 270 - Armored Core VI GTX 660M - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12600K Athlon II X2 270

Multi-Thread Performance

17640 Pts
1985 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3590 Pts
1154 Pts

Armored Core VI

i5-12600K vs Athlon II X2 270 in Armored Core VI using GTX 660M - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12600K Athlon II X2 270

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
17.1 FPS
1080p
8.9 FPS
1440p
12.1 FPS
1440p
7.2 FPS
2160p
6.8 FPS
2160p
4.0 FPS
w1440p
10.1 FPS
w1440p
6.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
34.5 FPS
1080p
19.4 FPS
1440p
25.5 FPS
1440p
16.1 FPS
2160p
15.3 FPS
2160p
9.5 FPS
w1440p
21.7 FPS
w1440p
13.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
51.9 FPS
1080p
29.9 FPS
1440p
38.8 FPS
1440p
25.0 FPS
2160p
23.8 FPS
2160p
15.0 FPS
w1440p
33.3 FPS
w1440p
21.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
86.7 FPS
1080p
50.9 FPS
1440p
65.5 FPS
1440p
42.7 FPS
2160p
40.7 FPS
2160p
26.1 FPS
w1440p
56.5 FPS
w1440p
36.7 FPS
i5-12600K
  • The i5-12600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-12600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-12600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 270
  • The Athlon II X2 270 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-12600K vs Athlon II X2 270 specifications

i5-12600K vs Athlon II X2 270 Architecture

i5-12600K Athlon II X2 270
CodenameAlder LakeRegor
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channelDDR2, DDR3
Part#unknownADX270OCK23GM
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i5-12600K vs Athlon II X2 270 Cache

i5-12600K Athlon II X2 270
Cache L164K (per core)128K
Cache L29.5MB (shared)1MB

i5-12600K vs Athlon II X2 270 Cores

i5-12600K Athlon II X2 270
# of Cores102
# of Threads162
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12600K vs Athlon II X2 270 Performance

i5-12600K Athlon II X2 270
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier37.0x17.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.9 GHzN/A

i5-12600K vs Athlon II X2 270 Physical

i5-12600K Athlon II X2 270
Die Sizeunknown117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1700µPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown410 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-12600K vs Athlon II X2 270 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments