i3-12300 vs i5-10400 - Armored Core VI GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i5-10400

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
12716 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2609 Pts

Armored Core VI

i3-12300 vs i5-10400 in Armored Core VI using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i5-10400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
30.5 FPS
1080p
30.8 FPS
1440p
24.7 FPS
1440p
24.9 FPS
2160p
13.7 FPS
2160p
13.8 FPS
w1440p
20.5 FPS
w1440p
20.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
57.1 FPS
1080p
57.6 FPS
1440p
47.6 FPS
1440p
47.9 FPS
2160p
28.4 FPS
2160p
28.6 FPS
w1440p
40.4 FPS
w1440p
40.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
83.7 FPS
1080p
84.4 FPS
1440p
70.4 FPS
1440p
70.9 FPS
2160p
43.1 FPS
2160p
43.4 FPS
w1440p
60.3 FPS
w1440p
60.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
136.9 FPS
1080p
138.0 FPS
1440p
116.1 FPS
1440p
116.9 FPS
2160p
72.5 FPS
2160p
72.9 FPS
w1440p
100.2 FPS
w1440p
101.0 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-10400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-12300 vs i5-10400 specifications

i3-12300 vs i5-10400 Architecture

i3-12300 i5-10400
CodenameAlder Lake-SComet Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i5 (Comet Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL61unknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12300 vs i5-10400 Cache

i3-12300 i5-10400
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs i5-10400 Cores

i3-12300 i5-10400
# of Cores46
# of Threads812
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730UHD Graphics 630
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs i5-10400 Performance

i3-12300 i5-10400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier35.0x29.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 4.3 GHz

i3-12300 vs i5-10400 Physical

i3-12300 i5-10400
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1200
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1200

Compare i3-12300 vs i5-10400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments