i9-10900K vs i3-6320 - Apex Legends RTX 2080 SUPER Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i3-6320

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
6047 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2236 Pts

Apex Legends

i9-10900K vs i3-6320 in Apex Legends using RTX 2080 SUPER Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-6320

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
113.4 FPS
1080p
65.7 FPS
1440p
84.7 FPS
1440p
49.1 FPS
2160p
50.4 FPS
2160p
29.2 FPS
w1440p
72.3 FPS
w1440p
41.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
175.1 FPS
1080p
110.4 FPS
1440p
137.0 FPS
1440p
86.1 FPS
2160p
88.0 FPS
2160p
55.0 FPS
w1440p
119.8 FPS
w1440p
75.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
236.8 FPS
1080p
155.1 FPS
1440p
189.2 FPS
1440p
123.1 FPS
2160p
125.7 FPS
2160p
80.8 FPS
w1440p
167.3 FPS
w1440p
108.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
360.3 FPS
1080p
244.6 FPS
1440p
293.8 FPS
1440p
197.1 FPS
2160p
201.0 FPS
2160p
132.4 FPS
w1440p
262.2 FPS
w1440p
174.8 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i3-6320
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-6320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-6320 specifications

i9-10900K vs i3-6320 Architecture

i9-10900K i3-6320
CodenameComet LakeSkylake
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Skylake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownSR2H9
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Sep 2015

i9-10900K vs i3-6320 Cache

i9-10900K i3-6320
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i3-6320 Cores

i9-10900K i3-6320
# of Cores102
# of Threads204
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630Intel HD 530
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i3-6320 Features

i9-10900K i3-6320
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3

i9-10900K vs i3-6320 Notes

i9-10900K i3-6320

i9-10900K vs i3-6320 Performance

i9-10900K i3-6320
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier37.0x39.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W51 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariableunknown

i9-10900K vs i3-6320 Physical

i9-10900K i3-6320
Die Sizeunknown150 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1151
Transistorsunknown1400 million
tCaseMax72°C65°C

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-6320 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments