i9-14900K vs Phenom II X2 550 - Anthem Graphics 448SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-14900K Phenom II X2 550

Multi-Thread Performance

41458 Pts
2021 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

5619 Pts
1066 Pts

Anthem

i9-14900K vs Phenom II X2 550 in Anthem using Graphics 448SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-14900K Phenom II X2 550

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
65.9 FPS
1080p
23.7 FPS
1440p
49.8 FPS
1440p
18.9 FPS
2160p
26.9 FPS
2160p
10.2 FPS
w1440p
41.1 FPS
w1440p
15.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
110.7 FPS
1080p
45.9 FPS
1440p
87.1 FPS
1440p
37.7 FPS
2160p
51.2 FPS
2160p
21.9 FPS
w1440p
73.9 FPS
w1440p
31.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
155.5 FPS
1080p
68.0 FPS
1440p
124.5 FPS
1440p
56.4 FPS
2160p
75.5 FPS
2160p
33.6 FPS
w1440p
106.7 FPS
w1440p
48.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
245.1 FPS
1080p
112.4 FPS
1440p
199.2 FPS
1440p
93.9 FPS
2160p
124.2 FPS
2160p
57.0 FPS
w1440p
172.3 FPS
w1440p
80.5 FPS
i9-14900K
  • The i9-14900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-14900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X2 550
  • The Phenom II X2 550 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X2 550 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-14900K vs Phenom II X2 550 specifications

i9-14900K vs Phenom II X2 550 Architecture

i9-14900K Phenom II X2 550
CodenameRaptor Lake-RCallisto
GenerationCore i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh)Phenom II X2 (Callisto)
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5DDR3

i9-14900K vs Phenom II X2 550 Cache

i9-14900K Phenom II X2 550
Cache L180 KB (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L22 MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L336 MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i9-14900K vs Phenom II X2 550 Core Config

i9-14900K Phenom II X2 550

i9-14900K vs Phenom II X2 550 Performance

i9-14900K Phenom II X2 550
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.2 GHz3.1 GHz
Multiplier32.0x15.5x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W80 W
Turbo Clockup to 6 GHzN/A

i9-14900K vs Phenom II X2 550 Physical

i9-14900K Phenom II X2 550
Die Size257 mm²258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

i9-14900K vs Phenom II X2 550 Processor

i9-14900K Phenom II X2 550

Compare i9-14900K vs Phenom II X2 550 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments