i9-12900K vs i3-12300 - Anthem GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-12900K i3-12300

Multi-Thread Performance

28791 Pts
14493 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3903 Pts
3550 Pts

Anthem

i9-12900K vs i3-12300 in Anthem using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-12900K i3-12300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
35.2 FPS
1080p
32.3 FPS
1440p
26.9 FPS
1440p
25.4 FPS
2160p
14.9 FPS
2160p
14.1 FPS
w1440p
22.4 FPS
w1440p
21.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
64.7 FPS
1080p
60.0 FPS
1440p
51.2 FPS
1440p
48.7 FPS
2160p
30.6 FPS
2160p
29.1 FPS
w1440p
43.7 FPS
w1440p
41.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
94.1 FPS
1080p
87.7 FPS
1440p
75.5 FPS
1440p
72.0 FPS
2160p
46.2 FPS
2160p
44.1 FPS
w1440p
64.9 FPS
w1440p
61.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
153.0 FPS
1080p
143.2 FPS
1440p
124.2 FPS
1440p
118.7 FPS
2160p
77.6 FPS
2160p
74.2 FPS
w1440p
107.5 FPS
w1440p
102.5 FPS
i9-12900K
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-12900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-12900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
i3-12300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-12900K vs i3-12300 specifications

i9-12900K vs i3-12300 Architecture

i9-12900K i3-12300
CodenameAlder LakeAlder Lake-S
ECC MemoryNoNo
GenerationCore i9 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only)Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)
Part#unknownSRL61
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateNov 4th, 2021Jan 2022

i9-12900K vs i3-12300 Cache

i9-12900K i3-12300
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L214MB (shared)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L330MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i9-12900K vs i3-12300 Cores

i9-12900K i3-12300
# of Cores164
# of Threads248
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i9-12900K vs i3-12300 Performance

i9-12900K i3-12300
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier32.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W60 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.2 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i9-12900K vs i3-12300 Physical

i9-12900K i3-12300
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1700FC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i9-12900K vs i3-12300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments