i9-10900K vs i9-13900K - Anthem RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i9-13900K

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
34549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
4683 Pts

Anthem

i9-10900K vs i9-13900K in Anthem using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i9-13900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
92.3 FPS
1080p
99.8 FPS
1440p
72.7 FPS
1440p
75.1 FPS
2160p
42.6 FPS
2160p
44.0 FPS
w1440p
61.7 FPS
w1440p
63.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
147.3 FPS
1080p
157.3 FPS
1440p
120.3 FPS
1440p
123.7 FPS
2160p
76.2 FPS
2160p
78.4 FPS
w1440p
104.7 FPS
w1440p
107.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
202.3 FPS
1080p
214.8 FPS
1440p
168.0 FPS
1440p
172.3 FPS
2160p
109.8 FPS
2160p
112.7 FPS
w1440p
147.6 FPS
w1440p
151.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
312.2 FPS
1080p
329.8 FPS
1440p
263.3 FPS
1440p
269.5 FPS
2160p
177.0 FPS
2160p
181.4 FPS
w1440p
233.6 FPS
w1440p
239.1 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i9-13900K
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-13900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i9-10900K vs i9-13900K specifications

i9-10900K vs i9-13900K Architecture

i9-10900K i9-13900K
CodenameComet LakeRaptor Lake-S
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i9 (Raptor Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRMBH
Production StatusActiveActive

i9-10900K vs i9-13900K Cache

i9-10900K i9-13900K
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2MB (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)36MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i9-13900K Cores

i9-10900K i9-13900K
# of Cores1024
# of Threads2032
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i9-13900K Features

i9-10900K i9-13900K

i9-10900K vs i9-13900K Notes

i9-10900K i9-13900K

i9-10900K vs i9-13900K Performance

i9-10900K i9-13900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier37.0x30.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP125 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 5.8 GHz

i9-10900K vs i9-13900K Physical

i9-10900K i9-13900K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i9-10900K vs i9-13900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments