i9-10900K vs i5-9400F - Anthem RX 6650M - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i5-9400F

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
12212 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2387 Pts

Anthem

i9-10900K vs i5-9400F in Anthem using RX 6650M - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i5-9400F

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
71.4 FPS
1080p
67.0 FPS
1440p
56.7 FPS
1440p
53.2 FPS
2160p
30.8 FPS
2160p
28.9 FPS
w1440p
46.8 FPS
w1440p
44.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
118.5 FPS
1080p
112.3 FPS
1440p
97.4 FPS
1440p
92.2 FPS
2160p
57.6 FPS
2160p
54.5 FPS
w1440p
82.6 FPS
w1440p
78.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
165.6 FPS
1080p
157.6 FPS
1440p
138.1 FPS
1440p
131.2 FPS
2160p
84.4 FPS
2160p
80.1 FPS
w1440p
118.4 FPS
w1440p
112.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
259.9 FPS
1080p
248.1 FPS
1440p
219.4 FPS
1440p
209.3 FPS
2160p
138.0 FPS
2160p
131.3 FPS
w1440p
190.1 FPS
w1440p
181.4 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i5-9400F
  • The i5-9400F is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-10900K vs i5-9400F specifications

i9-10900K vs i5-9400F Architecture

i9-10900K i5-9400F
CodenameComet LakeCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownSRF6M
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Jan 2019

i9-10900K vs i5-9400F Cache

i9-10900K i5-9400F
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)9MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i5-9400F Cores

i9-10900K i5-9400F
# of Cores106
# of Threads206
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i5-9400F Features

i9-10900K i5-9400F
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0

i9-10900K vs i5-9400F Notes

i9-10900K i5-9400F
This processor comes with an unlocked BCLK multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking.

i9-10900K vs i5-9400F Performance

i9-10900K i5-9400F
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier37.0x29.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 4.1 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i9-10900K vs i5-9400F Physical

i9-10900K i5-9400F
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA1151
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1151
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i9-10900K vs i5-9400F in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments