i9-10900K vs i3-9100 - Anthem RX 6650M - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i3-9100

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
9095 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2411 Pts

Anthem

i9-10900K vs i3-9100 in Anthem using RX 6650M - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-9100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
71.4 FPS
1080p
63.1 FPS
1440p
56.7 FPS
1440p
50.1 FPS
2160p
30.8 FPS
2160p
27.2 FPS
w1440p
46.8 FPS
w1440p
41.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
118.5 FPS
1080p
106.7 FPS
1440p
97.4 FPS
1440p
87.6 FPS
2160p
57.6 FPS
2160p
51.7 FPS
w1440p
82.6 FPS
w1440p
74.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
165.6 FPS
1080p
150.3 FPS
1440p
138.1 FPS
1440p
125.1 FPS
2160p
84.4 FPS
2160p
76.2 FPS
w1440p
118.4 FPS
w1440p
107.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
259.9 FPS
1080p
237.4 FPS
1440p
219.4 FPS
1440p
200.1 FPS
2160p
138.0 FPS
2160p
125.2 FPS
w1440p
190.1 FPS
w1440p
173.2 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i3-9100
  • The i3-9100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-9100 specifications

i9-10900K vs i3-9100 Architecture

i9-10900K i3-9100
CodenameComet LakeCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownSR3XQ
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Sep 2018

i9-10900K vs i3-9100 Cache

i9-10900K i3-9100
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i3-9100 Cores

i9-10900K i3-9100
# of Cores104
# of Threads204
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i3-9100 Features

i9-10900K i3-9100

i9-10900K vs i3-9100 Notes

i9-10900K i3-9100

i9-10900K vs i3-9100 Performance

i9-10900K i3-9100
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier37.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariablevariable

i9-10900K vs i3-9100 Physical

i9-10900K i3-9100
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA1151
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1151
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-9100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments