i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 215 - Anthem RX 6650M - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K Athlon II X2 215

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
1578 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
908 Pts

Anthem

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 215 in Anthem using RX 6650M - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 215

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
71.4 FPS
1080p
23.8 FPS
1440p
56.7 FPS
1440p
18.9 FPS
2160p
30.8 FPS
2160p
10.3 FPS
w1440p
46.8 FPS
w1440p
15.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
118.5 FPS
1080p
46.0 FPS
1440p
97.4 FPS
1440p
37.7 FPS
2160p
57.6 FPS
2160p
22.1 FPS
w1440p
82.6 FPS
w1440p
31.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
165.6 FPS
1080p
68.3 FPS
1440p
138.1 FPS
1440p
56.4 FPS
2160p
84.4 FPS
2160p
33.9 FPS
w1440p
118.4 FPS
w1440p
48.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
259.9 FPS
1080p
112.8 FPS
1440p
219.4 FPS
1440p
93.9 FPS
2160p
138.0 FPS
2160p
57.4 FPS
w1440p
190.1 FPS
w1440p
80.5 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i9-10900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 215
  • The Athlon II X2 215 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Athlon II X2 215 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 215 specifications

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 215 Architecture

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 215
CodenameComet LakeRegor
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX215OCK22GQ
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020Oct 2009

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 215 Cache

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 215
Cache L164K (per core)128K
Cache L2256K (per core)512K

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 215 Cores

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 215
# of Cores102
# of Threads202
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 215 Features

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 215
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 215 Notes

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 215

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 215 Performance

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 215
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz2.7 GHz
Multiplier37.0x13.5x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.15 V

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 215 Physical

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 215
Die Sizeunknown117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1200µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown410 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 215 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments