i5-10600K vs Athlon II X3 440 - Anthem GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10600K Athlon II X3 440

Multi-Thread Performance

14000 Pts
2571 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2850 Pts
1015 Pts

Anthem

i5-10600K vs Athlon II X3 440 in Anthem using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10600K Athlon II X3 440

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
32.9 FPS
1080p
13.3 FPS
1440p
25.8 FPS
1440p
10.4 FPS
2160p
14.3 FPS
2160p
5.8 FPS
w1440p
21.5 FPS
w1440p
8.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
61.0 FPS
1080p
27.7 FPS
1440p
49.4 FPS
1440p
22.3 FPS
2160p
29.5 FPS
2160p
13.3 FPS
w1440p
42.1 FPS
w1440p
18.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
89.1 FPS
1080p
42.0 FPS
1440p
73.0 FPS
1440p
34.1 FPS
2160p
44.7 FPS
2160p
20.7 FPS
w1440p
62.8 FPS
w1440p
29.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
145.2 FPS
1080p
70.8 FPS
1440p
120.2 FPS
1440p
57.9 FPS
2160p
75.0 FPS
2160p
35.7 FPS
w1440p
104.1 FPS
w1440p
49.5 FPS
i5-10600K
  • The i5-10600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-10600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X3 440
  • The Athlon II X3 440 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i5-10600K vs Athlon II X3 440 specifications

i5-10600K vs Athlon II X3 440 Architecture

i5-10600K Athlon II X3 440
CodenameComet LakeRana
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Athlon II X3 (Rana)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX440WFK32GIADX440WFGIBOXADX440WFK32GMADX440WFGMBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020Jan 2010

i5-10600K vs Athlon II X3 440 Cache

i5-10600K Athlon II X3 440
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)

i5-10600K vs Athlon II X3 440 Cores

i5-10600K Athlon II X3 440
# of Cores63
# of Threads123
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10600K vs Athlon II X3 440 Features

i5-10600K Athlon II X3 440
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i5-10600K vs Athlon II X3 440 Notes

i5-10600K Athlon II X3 440

i5-10600K vs Athlon II X3 440 Performance

i5-10600K Athlon II X3 440
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency4.1 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier41.0x15.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP95 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.8 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.425 V

i5-10600K vs Athlon II X3 440 Physical

i5-10600K Athlon II X3 440
Die Sizeunknown169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1200µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown300 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-10600K vs Athlon II X3 440 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments